Genetic Memories

Is there a way of using your own genetic memory to heal cancer?

The ‘Genetic Memory’ has records of both the normal and cancerous genetic information.  What usually happens when a person is diagnosed with cancer – their focus from that moment onwards is on their cancer.  How can it possibly be on anything else, when mainstream medicine has instilled such fear in each and every one of us when the “C” word is even mentioned.  How would life be different if they focused on their previous normal healthy genetic information.  Seems simple enough, why doesn’t that work?  Have we been indoctrinated by the medical profession so deeply, that to be diagnosed with  ‘cancer’ is a death sentence?  If so, how can we change that assumption?

The Konov Principle refers predominantly to prostate cancer, although can be used for any situation.  It suggests the afflicted person get in touch with their deepest self, and locate the perfect pattern of non-diseased genetic codes which produced ‘healthy cells’.   Memory is accessible, and once having accessed it, the correct coding can be remembered, and re-installed, similar to installing a computer program.

With a qualified practitioner, you can revisit the time before the diagnosis, before the symptoms, before this affliction took hold, back to the healthy state, when you were whole and correct.

It is suggested that before one tries to attempt to contact their genetic memory, they should find a method to first relax the body, and control the thoughts of the mind.

Reconnective Healing is one such way that can be used to relax and heal.  Once achieved, direct and positive contact with the genetic memory is possible, and the results are immediate and spectacular.

Does this mean that you can regain your youthfulness, lose weight and reverse any illness?  Quite possible.  The discoverers of DNA found four coded proteins arranged in specific coded matrices, although these chemicals are only the medium to store the memory, the basic pattern that creates these memories is the Morphogenetic Fields, which appears to be the controlling mechanism that writes the genetic memory, and is recording the genetic codes.

Morphogenesis also depends on organizing fields. The same arguments apply to the development of animals. Since the 1920s many developmental biologists have proposed that biological organization depends on fields, variously called biological fields, or developmental fields, or positional fields, or morphogenetic fields.

All cells come from other cells, and all cells inherit fields of organization. Genes are part of this organization. They play an essential role, although they do not explain the organization itself.  Genes enable organisms to make particular proteins. Other genes are involved in the control of protein synthesis. Genes are switched on and particular proteins made at the beginning of new developmental processes. Morphogenetic fields are not fixed forever, but evolve. Most developmental biologists accept the need for a holistic or integrative conception of living organization.

How are these fields inherited?  They are transmitted from past members of the species through a kind of non-local resonance, called morphic resonance. The fields organizing the activity of the nervous system are likewise inherited through morphic resonance, conveying a collective, instinctive memory. Each individual both draws upon and contributes to the collective memory of the species. Through morphic resonance, the patterns of activity in self-organizing systems are influenced by similar patterns in the past, giving each species and each kind of self-organizing system a collective memory. Sheldrake has proposed that memory is inherent to all organically formed structures and systems, thus bodily forms and instincts, while expressed through genes, do not have their primary origin in them. Instead, his hypothesis states, the organism develops under the influence of previous similar organisms, by a mechanism he has dubbed morphic resonance.

Morphogenetic fields are said to contain the information necessary to shape the exact form of a living thing and may also shape its behaviour and coordination with other beings.

The term [morphic fields] is more general in its meaning than morphogenetic fields, and includes other kinds of organizing fields in addition to those of morphogenesis; the organizing fields of animal and human behaviour, of social and cultural systems, and of mental activity can all be regarded as morphic fields which contain an inherent memory.

—Rupert Sheldrake